Monday, September 28, 2015

"A Full Life: Reflections at Ninety" by Jimmy Carter (Book Review by Bob Racine)



                        Published by Simon and Schuster, 2015
                                               
A month or so ago a public announcement was made in newspapers and other periodicals as well as on the major TV stations that our thirty-ninth President, Jimmy Carter, had been stricken with Stage IV Melanoma and that the disease had reached his brain.  Because of the deadly cancer’s degree of advancement to that part of the body, the chances of his survival for more than weeks and months are very dim.  Many including myself heard this news with great sadness.  I have been an admirer of this man for as long as I remember ever hearing of him – before he launched his campaign for election to the White House in the early 1970s.  No ex-President has been more active in the healing of humanity over the thirty-five years since leaving office than this peanut farmer and ex-Naval officer from Plains, Georgia.  He has never been noted for bombast or ostentatious rhetoric but has poured his energy into fruit-bearing labors, scarcely pausing to take a breath between projects.  That all his drive and all his insightful reflections upon crucial social and political topics must soon be deactivated, like a water tap to be shut off forever, is cause for much grief.   
                                               
Re-enforcing my respect for him is his choice of going on the air and making the announcement about his failing health himself, and doing so with a smile and a no-nonsense manner that could not have been more humble and friendly, and certainly not more positive in terms of a faith he has never attempted in the slightest to conceal or minimize.  He took us all right into the crisis – gently and reassuringly, like a member of the family.  Even some of our most conservative pundits have indicated how moved they were by these words from this moderate-to-liberal man of influence.  
                                               
The timing of this health crisis, however, and his publication of “A Full Life”, almost certainly to be the last of his plethora of writings, could not have been more timely.  He was about to begin a tour to sell it when he was presented with the medical findings and decided to postpone the tour in order to continue the focused radiation treatment his doctors at Emory University have prescribed.  Now, because of what looks to the public like an announced death sentence, the book will doubtless not need any special promotion.  I have just completed my reading of it and feel much served by its content. 
                                               
The account of his work on so many fronts over the space of a half century and more, beginning with his childhood on his father’s farm, is thorough and fascinating to read and follow.  That farm was rather huge; the family did more than grow crops, milk cows and slop hogs.  They had a shop, a business, in which Carter learned many skills, especially working with wood.  By the time he was grown he could make or repair just about anything wooden.  But if that were not enough, he was also an accomplished student in school and excelled in the sciences, an aptitude that served him tremendously after he graduated from the Annapolis Naval Academy. 
                                               
In the Navy he rose to a very high rank and became proficient in the knowledge and use of atomic science and engineering.  He was actually on the cutting edge of the peaceful use and development of nuclear fission.  He even commanded an atomic submarine, one of the first of them, and got to visit many countries during his sea duty travels.  He speaks of two near death experiences during those years on the ship, a collision with another vessel and a capsizing, both barely averted.  If the worst had happened, the western world would have lost out on a very productive and inspiring life.
                                               
One section of the book that I found especially significant has to do with the factor of race during his growing up years.  Though he lived in the Deep South and in a community where racial mores of white supremacy were taken for granted and largely unquestioned, Carter had a mother who was a practical nurse and who spent most of her nursing energies caring for the African Americans in the region.  He even had black playmates and remained on good terms with them until he was mature enough to begin fathoming the invisible barriers that separated him from them.  He was spared exposure to the vilest form of bigotry – enough that his consciousness did not require all that much raising on the subject of racial tolerance and equality when he reached adulthood.  He has always felt indebted to his mother for this role modeling; unlike his father she did not deny a black friend the opportunity to visit in the home.     
                                               
Four years as Governor of Georgia were invaluable in preparing him for the Presidency.  Those who comb their way through this autobiography will note how life in the Governor’s chair allowed him to cut his teeth on many of the issues he later confronted in his leadership of the nation.  But what landed on his plate as the head of the country carried him far beyond them.  I will name but a few: the deregulation of all industries to permit better competition in the manufacturing sector; making treaties with Panama; fighting members of Congress for the preservation of Alaskan territory set aside as memorials or as Native American or Eskimo possessions, with oil drilling confined to offshore; brokering peace in the Middle East; influencing foreign leaders, particularly Brezhnev, in the reduction of nuclear weapons; pressing for human rights in Latin America; contending with labor union leaders; taking a stand for renewable energy sources; and coping with the famous Iran Hostage Crisis (for which he was assigned a most undeserved blame). 
                                               
There is to this day great disparity of opinion as to why he lost the 1980 election and failed to be granted a second term.  But in a nutshell, he had, in spite of his polite, unassuming manner of speech and interaction, made too many enemies among certain elements in the government.  You can read Carter’s own account and decide for yourselves.
                                               
His post White House years have found him every bit as active and hard at work as his previous time in politics, perhaps more so.  He set up The Carter Center in Atlanta, an agency still going strong today that has given him leverage to address and become involved in numerous social and humanistic concerns.  Again, I name only a few: improving farming methods in Africa; intervening as a conflict resolver between nations and tribes across the globe; once again brokering peace; monitoring elections in areas where democracy is just beginning to find rootage; extensive work overseeing projects for Habitat for Humanity, which he calls “difficult, unpredictable, exciting, and gratifying”; writing and publishing a total of almost thirty books; birthing Special Education schools in China; interceding between nations to keep the peace; and all this long while teaching on the faculty of Emory University and teaching a Sunday School class in his home church.  He has kept close ties with all former living Presidents.  And he has not hesitated to keep thumping for what he believes to be crucial to the peace and good health of the planet, not the least being America’s declining influence across the globe.  He has also spoken sharply about the scourge of rape on college campuses, and that very recently.
                                               
Carter is one of those individuals for whom there is no such thing as retirement.  He continues to spend himself selflessly and enthusiastically for the country and the world he loves.          
                                               
But as highly as I regard this man, I am compelled to recognize his limitations as a writer.  This is the only one of his twenty-nine books that I have read, but if his mode of composition is the same in all or most of the others, I must conclude that he is first and foremost a writer of content.  He does not write with any real style.  His book is an autobiographical composite of facts and details.  He wants to complete the record, to get it all down.  He is not one to do much self-reflecting; he is skimpy in talking about his inner life.  He comes across more as a scholarly commentator.   
                                               
There are two good examples from the text that bear me out.  One moment he is filling us in on, and taking us through, his remarkable life as a submarine pilot and nuclear scientist, but suddenly he gets word that his father has died and soon afterward he resigns from the Navy and goes back to Georgia, taking on considerable financial struggle and starting life over as a farmer.  People he knew intimately in the service were shocked and felt cheated, and his wife Rosalynn, having enjoyed life as a Navy wife, took his announcement quite hard.  But nowhere does he even begin to tell us what his motivation was for doing this drastic thing.  Did he feel he owed it to his father?  He just reports on the event.  No explanation!
                                               
The other example is his measly mention of winning the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002.  I was looking forward to being taken through that chapter – getting the word of his selection, traveling to Europe to receive it, the occasion of its presentation, and most of all what it meant to him and his wife.  How did he feel about it?  Did he undergo any conflict in the acceptance of it?  But all he does is make passing reference to it, once again as if it is just a particle of happen-so information.  Was he afraid he would come across as bragging?  Why so much purposeless modesty, if that is what it was?  His silence makes us wonder if he valued it at all.   It is just possible that he does talk about it in one of these other books, but as part of the complete story of his full life, it should have been included in this writing.  In my view a very serious omission!

Carter had a great love for all of the arts.  No chief executive ever sparkled with more overt pleasure as he did when he sat in on a concert or a musical rendition at the White House; during his administration; at his invitation scads of performers came to entertain, those of every mode and variety and tradition, and he was quite exuberant with pleasure and excitement occupying the Presidential seat at the Kennedy Center Honors.  This country boy even loves classical music; he is especially fond of Wagner.  Since his departure from public office he has also taken up painting, which he does not speak about at any length, but I hope he finds enrichment for his soul as well as a good time exploring himself as an artist.
                                               
Those of you who have read all I have said in this review can now decide if it is the kind of thing you wish to read for yourselves.  Those who crave the knowledge of history, even the tiny footnotes, should find great satisfaction in poring over it.  It filled in a lot of spaces in my own knowledge.  And those who value as I do the place of faith and faith practice as a motivation for imaginative, open-minded and open-hearted leadership will benefit spiritually by reading an earnest account of a life fully lived without a doubt.  He may not be with us for long in the flesh, but he will. . .be with us.  God bless you, Jimmy, in this life and the next, as you so richly bless us!
                                               

To read other entries in my blog, please consult its website:  enspiritus.blogspot.com. To learn about me consult on the website the blog entry for August 9, 2013.

Monday, September 14, 2015

While We're Young (Movie Review by Bob Racine)



                                     1 hr & 37 min, color, 2015
                            
Anyone who views a sizable amount of cinema has surely encountered instances in which the film’s basic point or basic area of inquiry is not immediately apparent.  You are many minutes, maybe many scenes or sequences, into the action before it all starts to come together.  You feel as if you are being played with, until the spade at last strikes the mother lode. "Oh, I see where this is going!"  An AHA moment, which assures your fixed attention from that point to final fade-out!  Such was the case for me when I began following, or trying to follow, the plot line of "While We're Young", a quirky comedy of seeming eccentricity and desultory happenstance.
                            
I knew at once that Josh (Ben Stiller) is a forty-ish documentary film maker who has been laboring for many years trying to finish a film and that his spirited wife Cornelia (Naomi Watts) is the film’s producer eager but not quite impatient for him to finish it.  They are childless seemingly by choice and are enjoying their sense of freedom from tie-down.  But then along comes Jamie (Adam Driver), another aspiring film maker, and his wife Darby (Amanda Seyfried).  They are a twosome in their twenties, who scoop the older couple up into their rather wild and wistful circle of young acquaintances and spin them around until they lose focus on what they are all about.  I thought I myself might be losing focus on what I was supposed to be gleaning from the several odd encounters into which they are led.  The oddest is a visit with their new friends to a shaman who urges his devotees to drink a weird hallucinatory concoction that makes them barf into a bowl, allegedly barfing up all that poisons their minds and hearts.  The scene is reminiscent of the LSD trips that were so prevalent in the sixties.  They learn some new and out of character habits, like bike riding in Manhattan and hip hop dancing.  In short, the new couple sweeps them off their feet.
                            
But it was not long before I rediscovered something I feel I should have remembered right off the bat – that people are not always what they appear to be, ethically or morally, not even to themselves.   I also came to realize that this movie was dealing in a subject of the greatest interest to me – the creative process, and not only the process but the place of honesty and integrity that the process requires. 
                            
The screenplay by writer/director Noah Baumbach turns out to be something quite special.  The man knows from the beginning what he is doing; what looks at first like an incoherent circus of developments is the work of a coherent vision that pays great dividends, after all gauze has been stripped away.   What it all reveals, without toning down the deadpan, flippant, nervy humor that pervades almost every scene and confrontation, is worth the price of admission.  Some hollering gets done, but it turns out to be a bitter/sweet salute to loving hearts and self-reflective and self-respecting minds. 
                            
I may be scaring some of you away to report that the F word is rampant, but this time I did not mind it so much.  The way it is used in most instances makes it sound like a parody of itself, which in fact it has become from overuse.   
                            
You may have noticed that I am not disclosing plot details.  I wanted to steer clear this time around from issuing any spoiler alerts.  There are surprises and complications that are quite ingenious.  They all revolve around the question of who is playing whom. 
                            
I will point out that there is one character who serves a vital supporting role in the picture – Cornelia’s father (veteran actor Charles Grodin), an accomplished movie creator himself, who has influenced his daughter all through her four decades and has tried to be supportive of his once promising son-in-law.  It is a life achievement dinner in the elderly man’s honor that brings the competitive minds together and caps things off.  A quite revealing moment of truth to be savored! 
                            
There are timeless questions that the film plays with:  What is truth?  Where do we draw the line between it and fact?  To whose truth must documentary film makers be subject?  How much objectivity do we have a right to expect of them?  Must all artists be subversive in the pursuit of their craft?  Does creativity require a certain amount of selfishness in its pursuit?  How purist does one have the right to be in the enforcement of critical standards?  Where does ownership enter the picture?  What part does age play in the seasoning of creative talent?  These questions are not given academic treatment; they brush by us in the rich flow of comic repartee.
                            
This is my first chance to scrutinize the gifted talent of Ben Stiller up close.  He has surely come a long way from Saturday Night Live and other TV comic work of a generation ago.  His portrayal of Josh is seemingly flawless; his timing is superb. His character takes a well deserved place in the Woody Allen tradition as a somewhat uncoordinated little guy aiming either too high or too low.  Especially does this come out in two scenes wherein Josh tries to explain, first to a hedge fund donor and second to his father-in-law, what his unfinished magnum opus is about – two of the funniest monologues I have lately seen and listened to.  They are a scream! 
                            
And until now I have been just as unfamiliar with the work of Naomi Watts, though she has appeared in a vast assortment of films.  Her filmography indicates that she is a steady worker, with something in release just about every year for the last ten to twenty.  She is a force to embrace and works most effectively with Stiller.  They are an outstanding team.  I hope that they both get some award recognition at year’s end.
                            
Baumbach is an independent movie maker who made his name with “The Squid and the Whale” (2005), a domestic drama that got rave attention at the Sundance Film Festival and an Oscar nomination for Original Screenplay.  He later drew praise and commercial success with “Frances Ha” (2012), about an aspiring young female dancer, which I may be reviewing soon on this blog.  He is certainly an auteur to be watched.  His knowledge of people is keen; his portrayal of human emotion strikes me as exceptional, and his gift for creating incisive dialogue as well.  And it all feels so spontaneous.  In “While We’re Young” he not only delves into the business of creativity, but does so most ingeniously and drives what he has to say homeward in what for me is an unforgettable last scene – perhaps the funniest scene in the whole show, a sight gag that I will never forget.  It left me reeling with laughter right into the closing credits.  A real corker!   I wish many of you the same pleasure from seeing this that I have derived.        


To read other entries in my blog, please consult its website:  enspiritus.blogspot.com. To learn about me consult on the website the blog entry for August 9, 2013.