How much do we laugh when we
attend the movies? We cry at sad or
tragic moments, we tense up in action scenes, we kind of hold our breath at
suspenseful points – we are entertained, that is absorbed, in one manner or
another (or we are not), but how much pure, consuming laughter do we experience? In the vast majority of theatrical motion
pictures we can always find something, somewhere in the incidental fabric of
the storyline, to provoke at least a chuckle or two, if not a sage moment of
comedic insight. Laughs of various sizes
are scattered around in screenplays the way most of us anoint our tastiest
meals with salt and pepper. But those
condiments are not the substance of the food.
They only flavor it, freshen it, spice it up, maybe to some extent
enliven otherwise dull taste buds. But
how many essentially funny pictures ever get made – essentially funny, not
just incidentally so? When we speak of a
movie comedy, we are actually speaking of a relative rarity.
You may have noticed that
when awards time rolls around the nominee list is never dominated by
comedies. You are amazed if a quarter of
them fit that bill. The dramatic films dominate. This year’s Oscar contenders for Best
Picture, nine in number, are typical in this respect. As of this writing I have not seen most of
them, but from what has been written about their content, the only one that
sounds as if it could be largely comedic is “Silver Linings Playbook.” And even in this case the characters are far
from traditionally sympathetic. Both the
leads are whacked out, unstable and bordering on dangerous. You look long and hard for dominant humor in
“Lincoln,” “Les Miserables,” or “Zero Dark Thirty.” Good movie comedy is at a premium, and there
is a plausible, pointed reason for this paucity: They are much harder to
make.
Yes, they are much harder to
make!
And that is because the human
comedy is harder to underscore. The
complicating thing is that we are all a part of it. It is like trying to view the contour of
earth from the ground on which we rest our feet. How do we get above the melee and see
ourselves from another perspective?
Where is the humor in our ever so ordinary lives? It is no easy trick.
A good movie comedy is more
than a bag of jokes or one-liners. It is
more than a contrived gag or two or three. . .
It is the use of the camera and profound writing and the craft of the
medium to trace the arc of the absurd in imaginative human behavior and
practice and (here comes the make-or-break part) visualize it. So much has to be exact and very right to
make such a thing work. In drama,
especially melodrama, you can cheat and pad and pander and get away with so
much more pretentiousness. Drama is more
sensational, and do we not all love the sensational? We also love sitting with our mouths wide
open with tense expectation. But the
parameters of excellent comedy are much tighter.
By my personal standard of
judgment, for a movie to be classified as essentially, not just incidentally,
comedy, the premise itself has to be funny or at least highly
suggestive of funny. Just the idea of the story situation itself when spelled out must
provoke a notion of humor or absurdity.
As of this writing the
following are my twenty favorite movie comedies of all time filmed in
English. In each case I have simply
written out the premise as I see it. I
have not gone into detail or given even a thumbnail review or evaluation. All of these, as far as I can tell, are
available in DVD. You will notice that
the most recent release date is 1993.
This is not say that none of quality have come forth in the past twenty
years, just that I have not seen one according to my standards that would
surpass these particular choices.
Let me make it clear that these are my selections and mine alone. I have not consulted with any committee or taken any polls or put out any feelers, nor have I been directly or consciously influenced by any critic societies or special listings or any ratings system or group consensus. These are my favorites; they are not my high-minded pronouncements of final judgment – not necessarily “the best” for any and all patrons of cinema art. I have listed them in alphabetical order, not in any order of priority or preference.
Broadcast News
(1987)
Premise: A major TV news
outfit is somehow managed by an eccentric, blatantly bipolar, perfectionist but
likeable woman.
A tantalizing satire about the world of
television journalism emerges, one that digs irreverently and deliciously at
the underside of the profession.
City Lights
(1931)
Premise: A bungling,
accident prone street tramp (none other than Charlie Chaplin’s) pulls an
assortment of crazy devices out of his empty pockets to work a miracle – by way
of considerable high jinks and the pulling of the audience’s legs.
Dr. Strangelove, or
How I learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964)
Premise: Imagine a lame
brained American president; a puffed up and pushy General; a berserk Air Force
commander; a
paraplegic ex-Nazi adviser to the President; and a SAC pilot for whom the bomber plane is a delightful toy. These outrageous creatures have a ball
together cooking up a wacko version of World War III.
Forrest Gump
(1994)
Premise: A deep south fellow with a pea-sized brain
but with unheard of motor attributes and an innocent and trusting nature goes
from playground “idiot” as a child to college football star to Vietnam War
valiant to industrial millionaire to loving father and turns out to be an
inadvertent match for every crisis faced by the Baby Boomer generation. He can never win for winning. (You may consult my blog website and read my
review of this one on my 7-20-12 posting.)
Gods Must Be Crazy, The (1980)
Premise: Take the following ingredients and mix them
together: the wanderings and habits of an African bushman searching for the
edge of the world where he plans to deposit a coke bottle; a handsome wild life
expert given suddenly to pratfalls and general clumsiness when he confronts
women; quirky moments of interplay between man and beast; and amateur outlaws
easily distracted from their criminal business to play cards or take a
nap. Of course the bushman is the show
stealer.
Graduate, The
(1967)
Premise: Benjamin, fresh
out of the university and “a little worried about my future,” so overwhelmed
and numbed by his parents and the flighty, eccentric world that they inhabit, is saved from total
befuddlement by sexual attention from the deviously devilish and much older
Mrs. Robinson – until he falls for her daughter.
Groundhog Day
(1993)
Premise: A bored and burned out weatherman finds
himself reliving the same day of his life over and over and over again. How would any of us react if we found that
happening? His responses to the
experience are consistently cheeky, oddball and outrageous.
Lilies of the Field (1963)
Premise: A knockabout,
itinerant African-American construction worker with a hang loose personality
meets the Germanic and stern Mother Superior of a band of immigrant nuns who
thinks he is the architect God has sent her and her sisters to build a chapel
in the desert. How’s that again? ?
? Yeah, sure! ! !
Manhattan
(1979)
Woody Allen again plays the
schlemiel, this time a divorcee courting a teenager while becoming entangled with his married
friend’s mistress and suffering continuing embarrassment at the hands of his
lesbian ex-wife. When asked why he got
divorced, he replies, “My wife left me for another woman.” Who are the teenagers and who the adults in
this mix-up?
Modern Times
(1936)
Premise: The last movie in which
Chaplin’s Little Tramp character was seen.
The awkward, mustachioed, baggy pants fellow with the cane and bowler
hat this time does a tricky balancing act as he makes mirthful sport of industry
and commerce and politics during the Great Depression.
Moonstruck
(1987)
Premise: The saucy, sassy, dippy,
dizzy romantic turnabouts in a lively Italian American family, who fumble and
tumble and dicker and bicker their way into our deepest affections.
Philadelphia Story, The (1940)
Premise: Cast and crew have heaping fun giving
Philadelphia high
society a tumble. A wealthy, snooty
heiress on her wedding day is unwound by the unexpected visit of her ex-husband
and an overeager society columnist looking for the juicy story. Screwball all the way!
1776 (1972)
Premise: Events leading up
to the signing of the Declaration of Independence are given musical satire
treatment, the movie derived from the Broadway production. Imagine a surly John Adams who sings to his
political opponents, a Thomas Jefferson who would rather be at home in bed with
his Virginia wife than write the document, and a quite ribald, good humored Ben
Franklin with an extraordinary gift for riposte. The cast is huge and just about everyone in
this Congress is slightly tilted.
Singin’ in the Rain (1952)
Premise: An all-thumbs Hollywood studio for silent
movies in the late 1920s is forced to convert to sound in this much adored
musical. The obstacles they have to
confront as they trip over each other are flat out fun for the whole
family.
Some Like It Hot (1959)
Premise: Two jazz musicians
during the Roaring Twenties on the lam from murdering mobsters must join an
all-female band to hide away and stay safe, without any of its curvaceous
constituents knowing who and what they are.
Yes, that’s right! They have to
dress up like women and persuade everyone that they are women.
Thousand Clowns, A (1965)
Premise: Murray, an impudent society dropout, who
happens to be a gifted and former comedy writer, is something of an adult
child, determined “to give the world a goosing” however he can. He lives in Manhattan with his precocious
un-adopted 12-year-old nephew, who has assumed something of the adult role in
their one-room apartment. Murray’s
lifestyle of pure whimsy and playfulness, however, gets a wild, sudden
disruption when the child welfare bureau comes calling and he falls for the
woman social worker handling his case.
Tom Jones
(1963)
Premise: The adventures of an 18th
century bastard kid in merry ole England trying to live down his disgrace are
bawdy and bounding in all kinds of bedlam, brash buffoonery and
naughtiness. It is based upon the
classic Henry Fielding novel.
Tootsie
(1982)
Premise: A discontented actor,
persona non grata to casting directors and eager to raise money for mounting
the kind of sophisticated theatre in which he believes, disguises himself as a
woman and gets chosen for the starring female lead in a TV soap opera. Complications accrue, however, from this
unusual setup, not the least the question of how he can maintain his cover and
get out safely from under it when the time comes?
When Harry Met Sally (1989)
Premise: These title
characters are
two unsettled young adults who require chance meetings, misunderstandings and
forced acquaintance over many years to find out that they are right for each
other. Their endless efforts to fend
each other off with flippant comments, manipulation and downright insult
produce none of the desired negative effect, while cupid waits patiently in the
wings.
Young Frankenstein (1974)
Premise: The third generation Dr. Frankenstein inherits
the estate and is enticed back to the famous monster-making lab where he gets
hooked. It sounds scary, until you are
told that Mel Brooks and Gene Wilder are serving things up, and how can we
expect them to do that without an abundance of sight gags and zany creatures
chewing up the scenery! Here you only
have to know who controls the picture to know we are not speaking of a drama or
a horror show.
To read other entries in my
blog, please consult its website:
enspiritus.blogspot.com
I welcome feedback. Direct it to bobracine@verizon.net
i am very much enjoying you blog good sir!!!
ReplyDeletekeep them coming!!!
Tonylee