Yes,
the movie is out. No, I have not seen
it. Yes, I plan to see it as soon as its turn comes up on my Netflix
queue. Will I review it separately? You can count on that, but I feel some
trepidation over whether or not it will do full justice to what is a supremely
penetrating and powerful novel and maybe the last word on courage and
intelligence in the face of terminal illness.
It is also a writing that invents new language to explore the
confounding riddle of human existence, reflected in the experience of two teenage
victims of cancer who await their impending fate.
No
words of mine could ever do justice to the richness of Green’s prose and the
corresponding depth of his insight, bearing in mind that the two qualities do
not always go together in the annals of fiction. Great prose has many times been wasted on
paper thin narratives, and great plots on profound subject matter have often
been deprived of the acute facility of verbal expression and insight for which
they cry. But “The Fault in Our Stars”
excels both ways, I am happy to say.
This
is most definitely a love story, but one unlike any you are ever likely to read
again. Hazel, a sixteen-year-old, cancer
stricken American girl who has never breathed normally, carrying a tank of air
around with her on a little cart and even sleeping with tubes in her nose, is
the first person narrating voice. From
her rather sophisticated (for her age) perspective (she has already gotten a
GED and is taking college courses) we experience her strange but humane love
affair with Gus, a seventeen-year-old boy whose osteosarcomatic condition has
already claimed one of his legs but from all appearances is in a state of
remission. She is accustomed to being a
quiet participant in a cancer kid support group, resigned to the short life her
physicians have already prognosticated.
A near death experience a few years before left her quite depressed,
until her parents intervened and got her into the group on her analyst’s
advice. There she meets Gus, who changes
her life in many fundamental ways. Their
short time together carries them deep into each other’s hearts and imaginations
and farther across the earth than anyone could ever have expected.
Their
shared love of a pulp novel written by an expatriate American living in
Amsterdam stirs their curiosity to a point that they take a trip, along with
Hazel’s mother, to visit him, their journey financed by the man himself, who
has allegedly invited them over. Their
encounter with the author turns out to be something quite unpleasant but at the
same time instructive, and it serves as an introduction and an incentive for
their visit to the Anne Frank House, in my opinion the most poignant moment in
the narrative.
Wise
beyond their years, Hazel and Gus spout sayings, either verbally or, on Hazel’s
part, in private reflection that come out as narration. Try on some of these:
Love
between two people is “keeping a promise anyway.”
“Pain demands to be felt.”
“The
world is not a wish granting factory.”
“Some
infinities are bigger than other infinities.”
Hazel
tells us that “the worst part of having cancer, sometimes. . .[is that] the
physical evidence of disease separates you from other people.” She notes this when she and Gus have to board
a plane, where their handicaps seem to define them in the eyes of the passengers
and crew.
Hazel
challenges the classic Shakespearian line about the fault being in us, not in
our stars. “Easy enough to say when
you’re a Roman nobleman (or Shakespeare), but there is no shortage of fault to
be found amid our stars.” Hence the
book’s title! Says Gus in reference to
cancer kids, “We’re all just side effects, right?” Hazel echoes back, “Side effects of the
relentless mutation that made the diversity of life on earth possible. . .
Barnacles on the container ship of consciousness.” Both of them are quoting their favorite
author, whose words they have internalized.
But
let no one reading this review get the idea that these kids are morbid. They are anything but that. They have a pervasive sense of humor and an
air of sophistication that is never insulting or high-handed. They do something for each other that
prophets and collegiate minds could never hope to replicate. And there is no lack of compassion in their
hearts, as evidenced by their attendance upon the suffering of a teen friend
named Isaac, who loses his eyesight from the deadly disease.
At
one point Gus says something to Hazel that should be appropriated by anyone who
seeks to love another individual – wife, husband, child, sibling, parent, or
friend. It makes music that binds one
life to another, one soul or spirit to another. “You are so busy being you that you have no
idea how utterly unprecedented you are.”
That could describe almost any of us as we do battle with self-doubt,
frustrated ambition or even depression.
Is the tale a sad one? From one
standpoint! Is it inspiring? Is it purifying to the soul? Is it enriching? Yes and yes and yes! Is it funny?
And how! Is it enchanting? More than I had ever expected it could
be! No tearjerker this!
I
am pleased that the parents of Hazel and Gus are empathetic and supportive of
their offspring. They are never
obstacles in their children’s paths.
Green has spared us the added stress of a so-called generation gap, with
granite barriers standing between age and youth. Before she meets Gus, Hazel declares her
mother and father to be her best friends – in fact, her only friends. Of course Gus comes along as not only a love object
but also as a boisterous breath of air opening up the world for her.
At
one point Hazel reflects to herself: “the voracious ambition of humans is never
sated by dreams coming true, because there is always the thought that
everything might be done better and again.”
But this is not always born out by facts. It is inconceivable to me that this book
could have been written any differently or that it could be any better, and it
certainly needs no rewriting. I feel as
if I have been led through a series of interlocking episodes of discovery, one
emerging almost effortlessly out of another.
There is a rightness in every sequence, every chapter, every twist and
turn. I guess that is why I somewhat
fear seeing the film. Some of that
rightness might be spoiled by a screenwriter’s heavy hand. Please!
Let it not be so!
I
urge everyone from thirteen to one hundred and twenty years of age to disregard
any publicity you may have come across that holds this book to be essentially a
young adult market item. It should speak
to everyone. The form may be simple but
the content is such that one reading might not be enough. I know it is not enough for me. I am sure I will be pouring over it again and
again, before my own final curtain falls.
To read other entries in my
blog, please consult its website:
enspiritus.blogspot.com. To learn
about me consult on the website the blog entry for August 9, 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment